<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No geek is an island</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eurovision 2013: The final</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/17/eurovision-2013-the-final/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/17/eurovision-2013-the-final/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geeklife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurovision Song Contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems only a few days since the semi-finals kicked off in Malm&#246;, probably because it was. But now it&#8217;s time to look ahead to the Big One. No, not the rollercoaster. Not a long-forgotten Sandi Toksvig/Mike McShane sitcom, references to which will be lost on almost everyone, resulting in a convoluted sentence that adds [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems only a few days since the semi-finals kicked off in Malm&ouml;, probably because it was. But now it&#8217;s time to look ahead to the Big One. No, not the rollercoaster. Not a long-forgotten Sandi Toksvig/Mike McShane sitcom, references to which will be lost on almost everyone, resulting in a convoluted sentence that adds nothing. No. I&#8217;m talking the Eurovision final 2013! 26 songs, 12 hours of voting and the chance for one country to take away the coveted joint prize of the Eurovision title and the financial millstone of hosting 2014&#8242;s competition.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s meet the teams.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQJaab8j4fU">France</a></strong> &#8211; We open with our cousins over the English Channel. They&#8217;ve become quite good over the last decade at dropping something refreshing and different into the Eurovision pot and this is one of those. It&#8217;s not going to blow the contest away but it&#8217;s different, coherent, passionate and a good use of three minutes</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCZ6RRwKcIE">Lithuania</a></strong> &#8211; A surprise qualifier for Tuesday&#8217;s semi-final. Andrius may have screen presence but this is still a song in desperate need of a melody. Not amount of hair gel and staring into the camera can make up limiting yourself to three notes.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkbEkuk2TKM">Moldova</a></strong> &#8211; Like so many songs this year &#8211; especially the solo female vocalists&#8217; &#8211; this rather takes its time to get going. It could do with a stronger finale but no-one will be listening because it&#8217;s all about the dress.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdU02F9lT2g">Finland</a></strong> &#8211; Krista Siegfrids went down very well with the crowd on Thursday, topping off a camp display with a same sex kiss that overjoyed the audience in the stadium but led to Turkish television refusing to screen the semi-final. The lyrics are controversial &#8211; by turn demanding and submissive &#8211; but there&#8217;s no doubt this has a strong balance of playfulness and tunefulness. It should do well.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5m8aCZSvws">Spain</a></strong> &#8211; A long folky introduction often serves as a warning but once this gets some percussion behind it, it&#8217;s not bad. It&#8217;s fairly unmemorable but not unpleasant.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9uExokZcIM">Belgium</a></strong> &#8211; <em>Love Kills</em> came alive on Tuesday night. It came across much better than I expected and will hopefully do the same again in the final. After a good sixth in 2010, Belgium spent two years failing to qualify so it&#8217;s about time they had another decent result. This upbeat number might well trouble the top ten but it&#8217;s a strong field.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02uHFbCN2JI">Estonia</a></strong> &#8211; Loo break.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4S4m9R-ffA">Belarus</a></strong> &#8211; I&#8217;m by no means the only person to have noticed that Belarus is taking full advantage of Turkey&#8217;s absence from the contest this year. Presentation, production, music, performance, nonsense lyrics: it&#8217;s all straight out of the Ankara playbook. This should do well although it can&#8217;t be allowed to win as Belarus is an entirely inappropriate host for the contest. Look out for the daring rhyme &#8220;Solayoh/We play-oh&#8221;.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WmJXIR9xtw">Malta</a></strong> &#8211; Yes it&#8217;s twee, but there&#8217;s something endearing and positive about this simple song that forces you to like it. Gianluca&#8217;s performance on Thursday night wasn&#8217;t especially powerful and this might get lost in the grandstanding of the final.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VwzdeRNjtA">Russia</a></strong> is another country that I wouldn&#8217;t want to see hosting but this, with its marginally hypocritical lyrics about everyone loving one another and ending violence, could do well. It&#8217;s another number that really takes off for the final third.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8LPaowU9js">Germany</a></strong> &#8211; Blimey, this rips off last year&#8217;s winner <em>Euphoria</em> something chronic. It may not actually have plagiarised Loreen but it&#8217;s certainly fallen into the common trap of trying to emulate the previous victor&#8217;s success by copying the style and approach. It loses points for that and also because I wasn&#8217;t a big fan of last year&#8217;s winner, of which this is a pale imitation. Bah.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSs03Sp-4ME">Armenia</a></strong> &#8211; I&#8217;m sure I heard booing in the hall when this qualified from the second semi-final and, however gauche that way, I can undersand why because it&#8217;s proper naff. The lyrics are the main fault &#8211; &#8220;Lonely planet/Who has done it?&#8221; &#8211; but at least there&#8217;s a key change.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vtOwHHDAFc">Netherlands</a></strong> &#8211; Now we get to the good stuff with a run of six strong contenders. First up is Anouk with her birdie song. She has a great voice, although I&#8217;d've liked it to be a bit stronger in the semi-final, and the song is refreshingly different &#8211; understated and musically lush. I really hope this does well.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pNEEb6dzi8">Romania</a></strong> &#8211; I hope this does well too. It&#8217;s quite audacious and Cezar gives it his all (though will hopefully get them back later). Sure, there&#8217;s a gimmick, but the underlying song is strong enough to work with it. I&#8217;ll say no more because it has to be seen to be believed.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HALTU11QE6g">United Kingdom</a></strong> &#8211; Heeeeeeeeeere&#8217;s Bonnie! The latest act given Eurovision day release from the UK pop retirement home to take part in Eurovision is Gaynor Hopkins (call her by her name) carries the UK&#8217;s vain hopes this year. An experienced performer with a track record of touring Europe, she should do all right &#8211; although that&#8217;s what we said about Englebert last year. This is perfectly serviceable but sadly not the kind of dramatic power ballad that we associate with its singer. It&#8217;s a grower &#8211; admittedly not helpful when you only have one performance to hit home &#8211; and there&#8217;s a strong middle eight but after that it fades to nothing. If it wasn&#8217;t the UK&#8217;s entry, we probably wouldn&#8217;t look twice at it. Fingers crossed for top ten.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBUJ0u7ZVaE">Sweden</a></strong> &#8211; the host country have decided to keep to the dancey type of song that won them the contest last year. It&#8217;s by no means as distinctive as its predecessor and is slightly overwhelmed by Robin Stjernberg&#8217;s vocal gymnastics but it&#8217;s nevertheless a catchy and upbeat track. I hope he doesn&#8217;t grin as much as he did in Melodifestivalen.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmjsIhihJMY">Hungary</a></strong> &#8211; Like Malta&#8217;s entry, this was less strong in performance on Thursday night than it is in it&#8217;s studio recording. Frankly, singer ByeAlex looked terrified by the whole thing. I hope getting through to the final has perked him up because this is a nice little song, another gentle track that&#8217;s a bit different from the crowd, and it would be a shame if it was let down by a performance that holds back.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k59E7T0H-Us">Denmark</a></strong> &#8211; This run of six ends with the bookies&#8217; favourite and another potential winner from northern Europe. I could do without the clich&eacute; flute but you can see why this has attracted a lot of attention. Mix together a catchy chorus, syncopated percussion and good backing vocals and you&#8217;re halfway to the prize.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtunhyMW1hM">Iceland</a></strong> &#8211; I can&#8217;t say anything negative about this other than it&#8217;s rather bland. It builds up nicely and has a good singer behind it but after the previous six, this is a good opportunity to make the tea.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5egVzkZGTg">Azerbaijan</a></strong> &#8211; This won me over much more on Thursday night than it had previously. Very clever staging and a singer who exudes confidence complement a fun if fairly familiar song. I&#8217;ll even forgive &#8220;Hold me/Unfold me.&#8221;</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3k2MOJOkKg">Greece</a></strong> &#8211; Like Azerbaijan, this worked much better than expected on stage. I&#8217;m entirely on side with a song that says alcohol is free and I rather suspect the UK will give this plenty of points. There&#8217;s funky instrumentation and a memorable chorus &#8211; worth a look.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-onH40yB2uk">Ukraine</a></strong> &#8211; Bless the giant at the beginning (no, really) but it&#8217;s a terrible idea that adds nothing. It&#8217;s two styles stitched together as if it can&#8217;t quite make up it&#8217;s mind &#8211; or is cynically trying to appeal to two different demographics. The danger is, of course, that you alienate both. Will probably do better that I&#8217;d place it.</li>
<li>The last of the automatic qualifiers is <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2C-ePvHfAs">Italy</a></strong> and I&#8217;m not sure it would be in the final if the country didn&#8217;t put so much money in. There are a few OK moments scattered through the song but on the whole it&#8217;s pretty dull even if, like so many of its competitors, it improves towards the end.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjm-kCOMaPY">Norway</a></strong> &#8211; Despite the annoying bleating noise, this is another strong entry from Scandinavia. I&#8217;d've liked a bit more oomph in the performance on Thursday night. The song has a relentless drive to it but the vocals need that stark power to pull it off.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvdcRmzuXKM">Georgia</a></strong> perhaps turned in to BBC Three&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01sjs8d/How_to_Win_Eurovision/"><em>How to Win Eurovision</em></a> because this is certainly by the book. It left me feeling a bit flat but you can see why it could do well, especially if the audience have forgotten the dull opening by the time it reaches it&#8217;s worthier conclusion.</li>
<li>And finally, benefiting from the relief and greater attention afford the last entrant, it&#8217;s <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGaZKoim43U">Ireland</a></strong>. Already growing on me in the run-up to Tuesday&#8217;s semi-final, this still took me a bit by surprise &#8211; and not just for it&#8217;s cynical but welcome approach to staging. This could get a very high placing if it comes off on the night.</li>
</ol>
<p>There you go. Denmark&#8217;s a favourite but it&#8217;s quite an open field, especially with every one of the former Yugoslavian states out of the running. Will their votes stay east? Will Scandinavia retain the title? Will millions of viewers across Europe believe in a Welsh lass called Gaynor? Only time will tell. And if you&#8217;d like to cast your judgement alongside, you can <a href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/wp-content/2013scoresheet.pdf">download my 2013 scoresheet</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/17/eurovision-2013-the-final/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eurovision 2013: Semi-final Two</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/16/eurovision-2013-semi-final-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/16/eurovision-2013-semi-final-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 12:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geeklife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurovision Song Contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first semi-final was pretty good. Good work, Sweden, and a particular mention to Ireland and Belgium, who both came across much better than I expected. Most of my preferred songs got through &#8211; although Serbia didn&#8217;t help themselves with their bizarre Hello Kitty outfits and didn&#8217;t make the cut. We rightly said au revoir [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first semi-final was pretty good. Good work, Sweden, and a particular mention to Ireland and Belgium, who both came across much better than I expected. Most of my preferred songs got through &#8211; although Serbia didn&#8217;t help themselves with their bizarre Hello Kitty outfits and didn&#8217;t make the cut. We rightly said au revoir to Slovenia and Montenegro, with the dreary Lithuanian entry an unexpected qualifier.</p>
<p>Tonight it&#8217;s the second semi final and 10 of tonight&#8217;s 17 songs will progress through to Saturday&#8217;s final to join Belarus, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Moldova, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, Sweden, the UK and Ukraine on stage.</p>
<p>Here are my thoughts on the 17 songs vying for those coveted final places coming up tonight (from 8pm on BBC Three).</p>
<h3>The Good</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5egVzkZGTg">Azerbaijan</a></strong> &#8211; This is nice enough middle-of-the-road Eurovision fare, albeit with a key change that&#8217;s almost squashed. I actually prefer it to their winning song <em>Running Scared</em>, but &#8220;Hold me/Unfold me&#8221;? No.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdU02F9lT2g">Finland</a></strong> &#8211; Now here&#8217;s a fan favourite and no mistake. It&#8217;s pretty silly but has its camp sense of humour in exactly the right place and the result is good, toe-tapping fun.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmjsIhihJMY">Hungary</a></strong> &#8211; This is a lovely, gentle little number and not traditionally Eurovision at all. It might not come off as well live as in the pristinely produced studio recording but it&#8217;s another good entry from Hungary and I hope it does well.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4lwr-zMSnM">Latvia</a></strong> &#8211; The first couple of seconds are awful but suddenly it segues into a genuinely catchy chorus &#8211; and then they ruin it all with some naff rapping. Despite that it&#8217;s very jolly and that could be enough to carry it through.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WmJXIR9xtw">Malta</a></strong> &#8211; Yeah, this is a bit twee but it&#8217;s sweet and hard not to like. It&#8217;s gentle, tuneful and, let&#8217;s face it, a nice change for Malta from a big-lunged ballad.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjm-kCOMaPY">Norway</a></strong> &#8211; That bleating noise on the backing track is pretty annoying but the vocals are stark and the whole thing has a relentless drive to it.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi8mZ2ejLcE">San Marino</a></strong> &#8211; This is another song that leaves it almost too late to get going. Two minutes in, it finally goes up a few gears and we have one third of a good song. Most of it is pretty middling but the end, including a handsome key change, push it up to the next level.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBGpqq2LFSQ">Switzerland</a></strong> &#8211; Not only have Switzerland got a very well-thumbed copy of a rhyming dictionary, it appears to be a simple primary school version. Nevertheless, this is hard to dislike and the Salvation Army singers manage to beat you into submission through repetition.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Bad</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSs03Sp-4ME">Armenia</a></strong> &#8211; This is in danger of turning into the Stonecutters song from The Simpsons. &#8220;Lonely planet/Who has done it?&#8221; is as good as the lyrics get and they are sufficiently cringeworthy to spare us considering the reasonable melody and render this worth avoiding. The end&#8217;s annoying too. Still, key change.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYuSe5h-rrg">Israel</a></strong> &#8211; Israel does seem to swing back and forth wildly with its entries. Last year&#8217;s was fun but this is dreary entry and a perfect moment for popping out to make a brew.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Ugly</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LwGGo5ZfF8">FYR Macedonia</a></strong> &#8211; Good grief. With the rest of the former Yugoslavia out of the running, Macedonia could be on the receiving end of a lot of local douzes, and Macedonia&#8217;s answer to Freddie Mercury (Lozano) and Monserrat Caball&eacute; (Esma) will certainly need them. Not only did they forgot to bring a decent song, Esma genuinely appears to be gargling at one point. It&#8217;s like Lozano&#8217;s great aunt has turned up drunk to ruin his big moment on <em>The X Factor</em>. Are these two even talking to each other?</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3k2MOJOkKg">Greece</a></strong> &#8211; Bless Greece. Things have got so bad, they&#8217;re left with a song in honour of booze. I&#8217;m entirely in favour of the sentiment but some funky instrumentation can&#8217;t get away from vocals that sound like the subject of the song is also its fuel.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pNEEb6dzi8">Romania</a></strong> &#8211; Ladies and gentlemen, we&#8217;ve struck the motherlode. This is almost impossible to judge but I&#8217;d like to see it get the exposure it deserves on Saturday night. It&#8217;s kind of got a good melody but that&#8217;s hard to talk about without&#8230; Well, you really have to see for yourself. This is going to be Friday morning&#8217;s water cooler momment and I wouldn&#8217;t want to spoil it for you. I just hope he finds them again.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Rest</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pf-ZCI-UuA">Albania</a></strong> &#8211; A fairly standard rocky chorus and an OK guitar solo are undermined by letting the guitarist&#8217;s gravelly blandless loose on the opening verse.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bExp3aNOFsE">Bulgaria</a></strong> &#8211; Oh dear. This starts promisingly enough with a bit of Eurovision Percussion but then the singing says the same for three minutes, with no variety or structure aside from a bit of wailing near the end. There&#8217;s a drumming interlude that&#8217;s enjoyable enough but otherwise it&#8217;s only real use is as background music in an Indian restaurant.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvdcRmzuXKM">Georgia</a></strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s not bad when it gets going, pulling out a nice key change and (unintentionally, I&#8217;m sure) name-checking Denmark&#8217;s best entry of recent years. It could do well but lyrically it&#8217;s pretty flat and the opening is dull.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtunhyMW1hM">Iceland</a></strong> &#8211; Slightly bland but it builds gently, has a good key change and Iceland&#8217;s Badly Drawn Boy sings it well.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/16/eurovision-2013-semi-final-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eurovision 2013: Semi-final One</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/13/eurovision-2013-semi-final-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/13/eurovision-2013-semi-final-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 20:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geeklife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurovision Song Contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, Europe! It&#8217;s that time again &#8211; the most important TV event of the year, the Eurovision Song Contest. And the final is the same evening as the Doctor Who finale, just to make the whole night even more exciting. Before we can reach the final, though, 33 countries have to fight their way through [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Europe!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that time again &#8211; the most important TV event of the year, the Eurovision Song Contest. And the final is the same evening as the <em>Doctor Who</em> finale, just to make the whole night even more exciting.</p>
<p>Before we can reach the final, though, 33 countries have to fight their way through the two semi-finals. I&#8217;m a bit busy at the moment so let&#8217;s get straight down to business. Here&#8217;s what you can expect from the 16 songs in the first semi-final (Tuesday night at 8pm on BBC Three).</p>
<h3>The Good</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4S4m9R-ffA">Belarus</a></strong> &#8211; With no Turkey in the contest this year, Belarus could be moving tanks onto their lawn. It&#8217;s the kind of catchy female vocal and borderline nonsense lyrics we&#8217;re used to Turkey taking to a good position in the table. Seriously though &#8211; &#8220;Solayoh/We play-oh&#8221;? No rhyming prize for you.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9uExokZcIM">Belgium</a></strong> &#8211; A basic melody and a well-thumbed rhyming dictionary work well with an upbeat tempo and a nice middle eight to produce a fairly decent result. At the very least it&#8217;s NBFB &#8211; Not Bad For Belgium.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEd1TsVBo9U">Cyprus</a></strong> &#8211; There&#8217;s an awkward moment in the first verse of many Eurovision songs where they either take off or sink away. This didn&#8217;t shoot into the sky but it improved as it went along, averaging not bad at all..</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k59E7T0H-Us">Denmark</a></strong> &#8211; One of the top tips for the contest and one of many strong entries from northern Europe. The penny whistle is a bit of a gimmick but I&#8217;m a sucker for a Danish entry and while this isn&#8217;t up there with the best she&#8217;s got a good pair of lungs, a catchy chorus, some syncopated percussion and nice backing vocals, and that&#8217;s a strong combination.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGaZKoim43U">Ireland</a></strong> &#8211; First things first: no, it&#8217;s not Jedward. And even ignoring them, this is the best Irish entry in a long time. Going full throttle for a club feel, you could really imagine this as a summer hit or a One Direction single. I mean, <em>I</em> wouldn&#8217;t buy it but I could see it going down well. A lot of this is in the production, though &#8211; live on stage, it could be abysmal.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkbEkuk2TKM">Moldova</a></strong> &#8211; I spent the first half willing this to be one of the good ones &#8211; would it go for it? It did, rising up the scale to some big notes, although it slightly pulled its punch at the end.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vtOwHHDAFc">Netherlands</a></strong> &#8211; All those people who bought Lana Del Rey&#8217;s records? Anouk is after your votes. She has a characterful voice and the song has a simple, unchallenging beauty to it. It&#8217;s memorable and it deserves to do well.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VwzdeRNjtA">Russia</a></strong> &#8211; A sweet little ditty although very much afflicted with twee Eurovision lyrics about ending wars and poverty and that. A million times better than singing grannies though and the final third is terrific.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW7TAdytfww">Serbia</a></strong> &#8211; Serbia have dispatched their own version of Bananarama and you know, it works. The three Mojes work well together and the result is a proper toe-tapper &#8211; albeit one that ends rather suddenly when the three-minute maximum hits.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Bad</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCZ6RRwKcIE">Lithuania</a></strong> &#8211; The upbeat backing track can&#8217;t conceal that this song is missing something quite major: a tune. Each time it segues into the chorus, it feels like it&#8217;s going to grow big but no, it just carries on with one of the three notes Andrius condescends to use. A shame.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqL0SP3zARg">Slovenia</a></strong> &#8211; Predictably, some entries will attempt to mimic the previous year&#8217;s winner and so enter Slovenia&#8217;s answer to Loreen, Hannah. Unfortunately, creating a backing track of <em>really</em> annoying electronic pulsing doesn&#8217;t automatically make for a euphoric anthem. Well, sadly it probably does but the song itself can&#8217;t carry it and no amount of bleeping will fix that.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Ugly</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BmHI_57vJk">Montenegro</a></strong> &#8211; Now here&#8217;s some Eurovision awfulness of the old school. An intro of screechy vocals is followed by some naff rapping before a chorus that&#8217;s all over the place. The second verse appears to be a rapped seafood recipe. A mishmash of dreadful. Hurrah.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Rest</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RPLzJ5hqYc">Austria</a></strong> &#8211; Starts promisingly but after a few lines swerves so far into the middle of the road it&#8217;s a danger to traffic in both directions. The big key change comes too late to redeem it and with too much wailing.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdESBf3UFQI">Croatia</a></strong> &#8211; They might look like an identity parade in Moss Bros but this is melodic and harmonious. It doesn&#8217;t seem anywhere near as miserable as it should really.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02uHFbCN2JI">Estonia</a></strong> &#8211; This seems fine. Nothing desperately wrong with it but yeah. Next.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-onH40yB2uk">Ukraine</a></strong> &#8211; After a gentle start, the change in direction and stabbing synths caught me by surprise. It&#8217;s fun while it lasts but it doesn&#8217;t really build to anything. It&#8217;s one of the tips for a good placing, which bemuses me.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/05/13/eurovision-2013-semi-final-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s influential?</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/04/26/whats-influential/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/04/26/whats-influential/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been articles from a number of media organisations recently attempting to list the most influential TV shows of all time. I can&#8217;t be bothered to look them up or link to them because, as we all know from people on Twitter, old media is dead. But, in the olden days of blogging &#8211; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been articles from a number of media organisations recently attempting to list the most influential TV shows of all time. I can&#8217;t be bothered to look them up or link to them because, as we all know from people on Twitter, old media is dead.</p>
<p>But, in the olden days of blogging &#8211; and this dear, neglected blog of mine is nine years old this month &#8211; we liked to join in a conversation by writing our own posts and linking to someone else&#8217;s. So, since Laurie has compiled <a href="http://sillysalmonslacks.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/the-most-influential-tv-shows-of-all.html">his top 10 most influential TV shows</a> in the new media world of teh internets, I&#8217;m happy to link to and discuss it &#8211; and then, of course, put my money where my mouth is with my own stream of consciousness list.</p>
<p>The first question to consider, though, is what we really mean by &#8220;influential&#8221;? Are we talking television that changed the world? Does that mean we&#8217;re morally obliged to dig up <em>Cathy Come Home</em> &#8211; and lull comatose into our kitchen sinks? Is affecting the words people use in everyday life as significant as heralding shifts in public policy? (Probably not.) Or do we mean TV that influenced TV itself and shaped what subsequently reached our screens? I&#8217;m going to assume we mean influence on both the world and on television, although as a fan of good TV, my list will lean towards the latter. And, while good TV can certainly influence the mood of the audience, I&#8217;m going to assume that we don&#8217;t just mean &#8220;Was it good telly?&#8221;</p>
<p>These lists are subjective but I nevertheless take issue with a fair few entries in <a href="http://sillysalmonslacks.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/the-most-influential-tv-shows-of-all.html">Laurie&#8217;s</a>. <em>The Office</em>? Sure. <em>Only Fools and Horses</em>? Nah. Very successful in its own right and yes, it popularised certain words and phrases, but its lasting influence is minimal. I&#8217;m not sure what the case is for <em>The Avengers</em> either &#8211; a classic show but what&#8217;s the major influence? A string of half-baked and now largely forgotten ITC knock-offs? And I don&#8217;t agree either with <em>Tenko</em>, <em>Blackadder</em> or <em>Secret Army</em>. While the latter had the crucial effect of leading directly to <em>&#8216;Allo Allo!</em>, that doesn&#8217;t seem a strong enough reason to put it in a shortlist of the most influential shows.</p>
<p>Off the top of my head, then, here are my ten. Where I&#8217;ll also differ from Laurie in compiling my list is that I&#8217;m happy to include shows I haven&#8217;t seen or don&#8217;t like because it&#8217;s not a list of shows I&#8217;ve seen or like but about impact. I&#8217;m also going to cast the net wider than the UK &#8211; although measuring influence largely with respect to the UK &#8211; and beyond just drama. Like Laurie, I&#8217;ve differed from the lists that sparked this off as I haven&#8217;t limited myself to one pick per year but instead plumped for ten notable programmes.</p>
<p>These all probably have a good case for inclusion but bubbling outside my top 10 are shows like <em>Newsnight</em>, <em>Blue Peter</em>, <em>Big Brother</em>, <em>World in Action</em>, <em>Brass Eye</em>, <em>Sesame Street</em>, <em>Spitting Image</em>, <em>EastEnders</em>, <em>Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?</em>, <em>Murder One</em>, <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</em>, <em>Yes, (Prime) Minister</em>, <em>Brookside</em> and <em>Twin Peaks</em>. I was tempted to include &#8220;the news&#8221; but have stuck to specific programmes.</p>
<h2>My top ten most influential TV shows</h2>
<p><em><strong>Doctor Who</strong></em></p>
<p>I was tempted to leave it out because as a fanboy I&#8217;m biased, but <em>Doctor Who</em> has at least three strong reasons in its favour. First, it&#8217;s drilled its way deep into the national consciousness. Getting into a large lift only today, one of my fellow passengers commented, &#8220;It&#8217;s like the TARDIS.&#8221; Secondly, its current, post-2005 incarnation revitalised Saturday night drama and telefantasy as suitable for British prime-time &#8211; without <em>Doctor Who</em> there would be no <em>Merlin</em>, no <em>Primeval</em>, no <em>Demons</em>, no <em>Bonekickers</em>&#8230; Maybe I should stop there. And thirdly, the show has played a big role in inspiring writers, directors, composers and other creative people to pursue their vocations.</p>
<p><em><strong>Top of the Pops</strong></em></p>
<p>Gone but enjoying a walking death on BBC Four, <em>Top of the Pops</em> was the definitive weekly music show. I always preferred ITV&#8217;s <em>The Chart Show</em> personally but there&#8217;s no doubting Top of the Pops&#8217; influence on the charts and the number of live (or live-ish) performances by major artists captured in its aspic.</p>
<p><em><strong>Coronation Street</strong></em></p>
<p>I&#8217;d conservatively estimate that I have seen fewer than ten episodes of <em>Coronation Street</em> but I&#8217;m still happy to include it as the grandmother of all UK soap operas. While <em>EastEnders</em> might have gone for the more hard-hitting storylines and tackled issues that challenged public perceptions, <em>EastEnders</em> itself owes a lot to <em>Corrie</em>, which had laid the ground work of the evening community soap opera for more than 20 years before the BBC&#8217;s young upstart exploded onto the scene.</p>
<p><em><strong>The Office</strong></em></p>
<p>The mockumentary style had been tried before &#8211; <em>People Like Us</em> springs to mind &#8211; as had the comedy of awkwardness &#8211; look no further than <em>Fawlty Towers</em> &#8211; but <em>The Office</em> jumped up and down on the corpse of studio sitcom (now, thankfully, resuscitated by shows like <em>Not Going Out</em> and <em>Miranda</em>) and influenced the style and approach of many of the shows that followed in both the UK and US.</p>
<p><em><strong>That Was the Week That Was</strong></em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to pretend to have watched much of it but <em>TW3</em>&#8216;s legacy is widely recognised. It chipped away at the political establishment that had previously been treated with reverence and genuflection. It paved the way for other satirical shows, including <em>Spitting Image</em> and <em>Brass Eye</em> &#8211; both mentioned above as candidates for the list &#8211; and with its transition to American TV, there&#8217;s an argument that its influence even stretches to <em>The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</em> and <em>The Colbert Report</em>. It attacked apartheid, helped to bring down Profumo in 1963 and attracted complaints from the people it lampooned &#8211; always a good sign. It also boosted the careers of Frankie Howerd, John Cleese and Graham Chapman, Willie Rushton and Peter Cook, as well as making David Frost a household name. Frost&#8217;s profile led to both <em>The Frost Report</em> &#8211; which thrust Cleese and the Two Ronnies onto Britain&#8217;s TV screens &#8211; and, perhaps most importantly, <em>Through the Keyhole</em>.</p>
<p><em><strong>Fawlty Towers</strong></em></p>
<p>While I&#8217;m trying not to treat quality as a major factor, the sheer brilliance of <em>Fawlty Towers</em> in both scripting and execution means that it remains the yardstick by which other sitcoms will measure their success (a hiding to nothing really). That so many writers and producers respect it and would give their right arm to emulate it is a sign of its influence nearly 40 years (blimey) since the first episode was broadcast.</p>
<p><em><strong>The Simpsons</strong></em></p>
<p>A noble spirit embiggens the smallest show &#8211; and <em>The Simpsons</em> is certainly not small. While early cartoons like <em>The Flintstones</em> pushed animation into the realms of sitcom, it was Matt Groening&#8217;s creation that showed that animation wasn&#8217;t just for kids, and with huge success. <em>King of the Hill</em>, <em>American Dad</em>, <em>Family Guy</em>, <em>Archer</em> &#8211; once <em>The Simpsons</em> had broken through the celluloid ceiling, a new genre was born. It affected sitcom more widely, popularising visual gags and an approach focused on maximising the laugh rate. And as for the show itself, its influence on American life can be seen in the words of George H.W. Bush in 1992: &#8220;We&#8217;re going to keep trying to strengthen the American family. To make them more like the Waltons and less like the Simpsons.&#8221; And no, I&#8217;m not including <em>The Waltons</em> in this list.</p>
<p><em><strong>The Killing</strong></em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to predict its long term influence and it&#8217;s not as if there weren&#8217;t already bleak crime shows from Scandinavia (<em>Wallander</em>) or elsewhere (<em>Spiral</em>), but <em>The Killing</em> caught the imagination enough to coalesce around itself a whole genre of Nordic Noir. That opened the gates for series like <em>Borgen</em> and <em>The Bridge</em> to break through outside Scandinavia, and it also influenced the style of new dramas in the UK and US &#8211; most recently ITV&#8217;s murder mystery serial <em>Broadchurch</em>.</p>
<p><em><strong>Popstars</strong></em></p>
<p>Two shows that dominate the schedules and the public consciousness now are <em>Britain&#8217;s Got Talent</em> and <em>The X-Factor</em>. But before them came <em>Pop Idol</em> (and its chum across the Atlantic <em>American Idol</em>), and before those came the show that launched Hear&#8217;Say, <em>Pop Stars</em>. These series launched the careers of Girls Aloud, Will Young, Leona Lewis, Olly Murs and many more, including assorted Eurovision entrants and everyone&#8217;s favourite boy band, One True Voice. But they also reinforced a cultural shift towards the desirability of celebrity and &#8220;being famous&#8221; as an unachievable aspiration for thousands of young people. Prime-time talent shows have spread like the plague and <em>Popstars</em> was Typhoid Mary.</p>
<p><em><strong>Friends</strong></em></p>
<p>This one has sneaked in as I was disinclined to put another sitcom on the list but, on reflection, I think <em>Friends</em> justifies its inclusion. Its longevity and endless repetition has made it one of the best known sitcoms of the last twenty years. Like <em>The Simpsons</em>, it encouraged the genre to push for a high laugh rate, but &#8211; in common with many of its American predecessors &#8211; its characters and their relationships were a key part of the story, with Ross and Rachel possibly the ultimate will-they-won&#8217;t-they TV couple. It inspired a haircut, spawned a spin-off and did for studio comedy what <em>The Office</em> did for single camera.</p>
<p>So there you go. Ten shows, off the top of my head. Anything major I&#8217;ve missed? Or anything you think doesn&#8217;t deserve its place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2013/04/26/whats-influential/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now listen carefully, 007&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/10/05/now-listen-carefully-007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/10/05/now-listen-carefully-007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Die Another Day"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMDb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James-Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is liking Die Another Day a controversial view? That question came on up on Twitter this morning so I thought I&#8217;d find out pseudo-scientifically. I&#8217;ve looked at the Internet Movie Database&#8216;s rating for each film and here&#8217;s what the people scoring them say: 2006&#8242;s Casino Royale is the clear winner, and there are a few [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is liking <em>Die Another Day</em> a controversial view?</p>
<p>That question came on up on Twitter this morning so I thought I&#8217;d find out pseudo-scientifically. I&#8217;ve looked at the <a href="http://uk.imdb.com">Internet Movie Database</a>&#8216;s rating for each film and here&#8217;s what the people scoring them say:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/wp-content/bondfilms.gif"><img src="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/wp-content/bondfilms.gif" alt="Graph of Bond scores - raw date in table" title="Graph of IMDb Bond film scores" width="601" height="394" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2265" /></a></p>
<p>2006&#8242;s <em>Casino Royale</em> is the clear winner, and there are a few other interesting notes: there&#8217;s a clear early peak at <em>Goldfinger</em> &#8211; very much received wisdom &#8211; but that&#8217;s also the most watched (if we count ratings as viewers) of the early films. <em>OHMSS</em> has less attention paid to it than any of the other official Bond movies.</p>
<p>But what of <em>Die Another Day</em>? It hits a relatively poor 6.0, which you can see more clearly in context from the full data, ordering by score:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Year</th>
<th>Film</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Raters</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>Casino Royale</td>
<td>7.9</td>
<td>253817</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1964</td>
<td>Goldfinger</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>77120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1963</td>
<td>From Russia with Love</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>47393</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1962</td>
<td>Dr. No</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>61548</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1995</td>
<td>GoldenEye</td>
<td>7.2</td>
<td>114333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1977</td>
<td>The Spy Who Loved Me</td>
<td>7.1</td>
<td>41204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1965</td>
<td>Thunderball</td>
<td>7.0</td>
<td>44021</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1967</td>
<td>You Only Live Twice</td>
<td>6.9</td>
<td>40873</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1969</td>
<td>On Her Majesty&#8217;s Secret Service</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>32162</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1973</td>
<td>Live and Let Die</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>40291</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1981</td>
<td>For Your Eyes Only</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>39364</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2008</td>
<td>Quantum of Solace</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>163854</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1971</td>
<td>Diamonds are Forever</td>
<td>6.7</td>
<td>41574</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1974</td>
<td>The Man with the Golden Gun</td>
<td>6.7</td>
<td>38891</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1987</td>
<td>The Living Daylights</td>
<td>6.7</td>
<td>38634</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1983</td>
<td>Octopussy</td>
<td>6.6</td>
<td>40163</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1989</td>
<td>Licence to Kill</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>41075</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1997</td>
<td>Tomorrow Never Dies</td>
<td>6.4</td>
<td>82866</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td>The World is Not Enough</td>
<td>6.3</td>
<td>93250</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1979</td>
<td>Moonraker</td>
<td>6.2</td>
<td>39503</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1985</td>
<td>A View to a Kill</td>
<td>6.2</td>
<td>38112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1983</td>
<td>Never Say Never Again</td>
<td>6.1</td>
<td>30605</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2002</td>
<td>Die Another Day</td>
<td>6.0</td>
<td>101478</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1967</td>
<td>Casino Royale</td>
<td>5.2</td>
<td>15322</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
So <em>Die Another Day</em> is easily the least popular of the official canon, even pipped by rotten <em>Thunderball</em> remake <em>Never Say Never Again</em>, and only saved from the ignominy of last place by the presence of the weird 60s version of the movie that&#8217;s top of the list.</p>
<p>6.0 isn&#8217;t, in the scheme of things, a terrible score, so plenty of people must like the film. Nevertheless, from a Bond fan perspective, yes &#8211; going out to bat for <em>Die Another Day</em> is a little bit controversial.</p>
<p>Which isn&#8217;t very surprising because it <em>is</em> rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/10/05/now-listen-carefully-007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My top bestest films of all time (subject to change)</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/08/02/my-top-bestest-films-of-all-time-subject-to-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/08/02/my-top-bestest-films-of-all-time-subject-to-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geeklife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the bravado that only a national cinema organisation of great standing can muster, the British Film Institute has decreed which films are the Top 50 Greatest Films of All Time. It&#8217;s a poll weighted heavily to academics and critics &#8211; and, as a result, is rather pseudish, brimming with films that the reviewers&#8217; would [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the bravado that only a national cinema organisation of great standing can muster, the British Film Institute has decreed which films are the <strong><a href="http://www.bfi.org.uk/news/50-greatest-films-all-time">Top 50 Greatest Films of All Time</a></strong>. It&#8217;s a poll weighted heavily to academics and critics &#8211; and, as a result, is rather pseudish, brimming with films that the reviewers&#8217; would like people to know that they&#8217;ve seen and appreciated. It&#8217;s a selection of highbrow films, lest those who make a living from the movies be associated with something as lowbrow as &#8220;fun&#8221;.</p>
<p>Not that there aren&#8217;t fun films in the list or good films in the list. Of course there are. But it&#8217;s not an accessible list; not a list overwhelmed with movies that people who aren&#8217;t critics might have seen. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;d enjoy many of the films on the list &#8211; although of the seven I <em>have</em> seen, there are a couple I&#8217;d happily not sit through again.</p>
<p>The only response then &#8211; as already demonstrated with <a href="http://sillysalmonslacks.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/my-top-20-films-of-all-time.html">Laurie&#8217;s Top 20 films of all time</a> &#8211; is to share our own lists.</p>
<p>In <em>Doctor Who</em> fandom, a world dominated by lists in the way only true obsessives can achieve, we speak of two categorisations: <strong>favourite</strong> and <strong>best</strong>. It allows you to concede that the best story of season 11 is <em>Doctor Who and the Time Warrior</em> while harbouring much stronger personal feelings for the romping finale that is <em>Doctor Who and the Planet of the Spiders</em>. So this is a list of favourites that I also think are pretty damn good.</p>
<p>There are plenty of good quality films I would include in a more objective list but of which I&#8217;m not a particular fan &#8211; <em>The Godfather</em> being a prime example. As with the BFI&#8217;s, I&#8217;ve written a little bit about the entries in the top part of the list.</p>
<p>I reserve the right to change my mind about all of these tomorrow.</p>
<h3>The Top 50 Greatest Films of All Time</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong><em>Back to the Future</em></strong></li>
<p>If you excuse the somewhat dubious application of time travel theory (why would certain body parts disappear first when history is changed?), this is pretty much a flawless film. Fox and Lloyd are excellent, the script is brimming with laughs, the direction is spot on and the theme song is a karaoke classic. Five Deloreans out of five.</p>
<li><strong><em>Sleuth</em></strong></li>
<p>Adapted by Anthony Shaffer from his own stage play, this is wonderful. Pompous author Laurence Olivier and upstart hairdresser Michael Caine bound around a big country house attempting to outwit each other. There are twists, turns, a line of dialogue pilfered by The Smiths and a magnificently hammy performance from Olivier.</p>
<li><strong><em>Clue</em></strong></li>
<p>This one was never going to get anywhere near the BFI&#8217;s list but it&#8217;s an absolute joy. Thoroughly silly and unashamedly lacking in any deep meaning, this farce&#8217;s three different endings make it particularly good value for money &#8211; as it should be with <em>Yes, Minister</em>&#8216;s Jonathan Lynn behind it. The cast are great &#8211; it&#8217;s Christopher Lloyd&#8217;s second film in the top three &#8211; but the stand-out performance is Madeline Kahn&#8217;s, whose Mrs White is unforgettably weird.</p>
<li><strong><em>Psycho</em></strong></li>
<p>Marion Crane comes from Phoenix and eats like a bird. There may be a theme there, although it&#8217;s somewhat tangential to the main thrust of the film, as Norman Bates&#8217;s naughty mother starts killing visitors left, right and- Well, there are only the two murders. The shower scene is probably the most famous cinematic murder in history, but if anything (and perhaps because of that) the second is the greater shock.</p>
<li><strong><em>12 Angry Men</em></strong></li>
<p>I saw <em>12 Angry Men</em> for the first time a couple of months ago as part of my attempt to watch all of the films in the <a href="http://uk.imdb.com/top250">IMDB&#8217;s Top 250</a> (I&#8217;m up to 108, although it varies because the list changes over time). I was blown away by how good it is &#8211; especially since the fame of the film means I had a pretty good idea how it was going to go. The only shame is that, by its nature, there are no women in it at all.</p>
<li><strong><em>In Bruges</em></strong></li>
<p>The most recent film in my list, coming from 2008. I should hate it. The posters had actually put me off. A gangster film with Colin Farrell? No thanks. But it&#8217;s terrific &#8211; and not really a gangster film at all. It&#8217;s about the relationship between two Irish criminals, delivered through strong performances and a brilliant, theatrical script that begs to be performed. One of my favourite scenes (in any film) involves Brendan Gleeson on the phone, the only character on screen for several minutes, completely captivating as he trades bon mots with an unseen Ralph Fiennes.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Wicker Man</em></strong></li>
<p>Virginal policeman Edward Woodward visits a creepy Scottish island, with less than hilarious consequences. Weird, suspenseful and with a glorious finale, there is the added bonus of Christopher Lee luxuriating in the role of Lord Summerisle. Spoilers: there&#8217;s a wicker man in it.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Princess Bride</em></strong></li>
<p>A film I&#8217;ve perhaps slightly grown out as I&#8217;ve become more cynical but this was wonderful when I was younger. A lovely, funny fairy tale, full of memorable scenes (who can&#8217;t quote &#8220;My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die&#8221;?), and all told to Fred Savage off of <em>The Wonder Years</em> (now 36!) by loveable grandfather Peter Falk.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Usual Suspects</em></strong></li>
<p>Not a film I thought I&#8217;d enjoy; I was pleased to be proved wrong. It&#8217;s good all the way through but earns its high placing thanks to one of the best endings of any film ever.</p>
<li><strong><em>Kind Hearts and Coronets</em></strong></li>
<p>Alec Guinness playing every member of an extended family, men and women alike, while Dennis Price tries to bump them off? Sounds off but the result is one of the delightfully fine British films ever made. (Yes, a third black and white film in the my top ten. That must make me all arty and cool.)</p>
<li><strong><em>Vertigo</em></strong></li>
<p>With its iconic Saul Bass title sequence and much-copied pull back and zoom effect (as notably used in <em>Jaws</em>), <em>Vertigo</em> follows clean cut Jimmy Stewart as he gets increasingly obsessed about a woman he saw fall to her death. That&#8217;s not going to end well.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Thomas Crown Affair</em></strong></li>
<p>Before you nod approvingly at my choice of a sixties classic, hold your horses &#8211; because this is the 1999 remake with Pierce Brosnan and Rene Russo. More quickly paced, sexy and fun, this is far more enjoyable than the original. Clever, stylish, and another film with a terrific climax.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Lives of Others</em></strong></li>
<p>Yes, BFI, I can do foreign language films too. This German movie from 2006 is set in 80s East Berlin and examines the results of state surveillance through the ears of a Stasi agent who becomes obsessed with the subjects of his surveillance.</p>
<li><strong><em>Frenzy</em></strong></li>
<p>Hitchcock&#8217;s penultimate film and one of his less well known, this marks a return to London, featuring a bustling Covent Garden in its dying days as a fruit market. The neck tie murderer (that&#8217;s his method, not his victim) is on the loose. While laid-back policeman Alec McCowen attempts to solve the crime (and to avoid his wife&#8217;s culinary experimentations), Jon Finch tries to prove his innocence and Barry Foster off of <em>Van der Valk</em> swans about looking suave. A strong, seedy thriller.</p>
<li><strong><em>Raiders of the Lost Ark</em></strong></li>
<p>A rolling boulder, a magical Ark of the Covenant, Denholm Elliott, a stonking John Williams theme tune, Steven Spielberg behind the camera and Harrison Ford creating a new sardonic action hero. Oh, and that bit where he shoots the guy with the whip. What&#8217;s not to love?</p>
<li><strong><em>The Sixth Sense</em></strong></li>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if you worked out the twist. I didn&#8217;t and went &#8220;Ooh&#8221; in the cinema.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Sting</em></strong></li>
<p>Scott Joplin&#8217;s <em>The Entertainer</em> tinkles away, welcoming us to the 1930s Illinois and the 1970s film version of <em>Hustle</em>. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid &#8211; Newman and Redford &#8211; reunite to play an experienced con man and the slightly wet proteg&eacute; who brings him out of retirement to take down gangster Robert Shaw. It won seven Oscars, but more importantly it&#8217;s good, twisty fun.</p>
<li><strong><em>Se7en</em></strong></li>
<p>Forever destined to be associated with the phrase &#8220;What&#8217;s in the box?&#8221;, this is a second 1995 Kevin Spacey film to grace by list &#8211; and he&#8217;s suitably creepy in this one. Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman&#8217;s police officers &#8211; the latter soon to retire, in classic form &#8211; are on the hunt for a killer whose methods of murder relate to the Seven Deadly Sins. You&#8217;ve got to have a hobby, I suppose.</p>
<li><strong><em>Goldfinger</em></strong></li>
<p>Although the third bond film, Goldfinger is the most iconic, featuring golden Shirley Eaton, the laser interrogation, Pussy Galore&#8217;s Flying Circus, Fort Knox, Oddjob&#8217;s hat and <em>that</em> theme tune.</p>
<li><strong><em>Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb</em></strong></li>
<p>I was introduced to this a few year&#8217;s ago on the outdoor screen at Somerset House. Fittingly, while we were waiting for the film to start, Dr David Owen appeared from the Admiralty and walked through the crowd. Well I thought it was fitting. A very odd Kubrick film with some brilliant moments and one of the best lines in film: &#8220;You can&#8217;t fight in here! This is the War Room!&#8221;</p>
<li><strong><em>Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon</em></strong></li>
<p>This one&#8217;s in foreign too. I is cultured.</p>
<li><strong><em>Fight Club</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Who&#8217;s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Shaun of the Dead</em></strong></li>
<p>Yes, you heard me.</p>
<li><strong><em>Evil Under the Sun</em></strong></li>
<p>Another Shaffer script and a load of camp old fun.</p>
<li><strong><em>Brick</em></strong></li>
<p>A noir thriller set in a school.</p>
<li><strong><em>A Fish Called Wanda</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>From Russia with Love</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Twelve Monkeys</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Back to the Future Part II</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>The Fifth Element</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Gattaca</em></strong></li>
<p>Underrated science fiction with Ethan Hawke, Jude Law and Uma Thurman. And, I&#8217;ve just remembered, Gore Vidal.</p>
<li><strong><em>Murder on the Orient Express</em></strong></li>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter if you know whodunnit.</p>
<li><strong><em>Being John Malkovich</em></strong></li>
<p>Inspiredly bonkers.</p>
<li><strong><em>A Clockwork Orange</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Brazil</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>The Silence of the Lambs</em></strong></li>
<p>Ffffttttfftttffftttffftt</p>
<li><strong><em>The Empire Strikes Back</em></strong></li>
<p>Marginally better than the first one.</p>
<li><strong><em>Sneakers</em></strong></li>
<p>More Robert Redford. Has Superman&#8217;s dad from <em>Lois &#038; Clark</em> in too. And Danny from <em>The West Wing</em>.</p>
<li><strong><em>Star Wars</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>All About Eve</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Les Diaboliques</em></strong></li>
<p>Clouzot, you know.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Man Who Knew too Much</em></strong></li>
<p>Hitchcock&#8217;s colour remake of his own black and white film.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Dark Knight</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>The Game</em></strong></li>
<p>Michael Douglas has quite a night out.</p>
<li><strong><em>North by Northwest</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Airplane!</em></strong></li>
<p>I picked the wrong day to give up making lists.</p>
<li><strong><em>The Truman Show</em></strong></li>
<li><strong><em>The Lord of the Rings</em></strong></li>
<p>Yes, the whole thing.</p>
<li><strong><em>Galaxy Quest</em></strong></li>
<p>And why not?
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/08/02/my-top-bestest-films-of-all-time-subject-to-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eurovision 2012: The final</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/26/eurovision-2012-the-final/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/26/eurovision-2012-the-final/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eurovision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurovision Song Contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s today! It&#8217;s the final! I have booze, I have Euro snacks, and I have time for some snark before it all kicks off. We&#8217;ve come this far together. One more night. Let&#8217;s see at who&#8217;s made it through the rigours of the two semi-finals (I mean the acts, not you and I) and look [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s today! It&#8217;s the final! I have booze, I have Euro snacks, and I have time for some snark before it all kicks off.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve come this far together. One more night. Let&#8217;s see at who&#8217;s made it through the rigours of the two semi-finals (I mean the acts, not you and I) and look at the line-up for tonight&#8217;s Euromusic spectacular. No pussyfooting about &#8211; this is Truth.</p>
<ol>
<li><img src="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/wp-content/hump-150x150.jpg" alt="Arnold Dorsey" title="Arnold Dorsey" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-2225" /><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFNv9pjqZkk">United Kingdom</a></strong> &#8211; As Arnold Dorsey (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engelbert_Humperdinck_(singer)">call him by his name</a>) himself points out, <em>Love Can Set You Free</em> is a grower. Unfortunately, most of the voting public will see it just once, plus a few recaps. I&#8217;m still no fan of the key change in this but on a night with a shocking shortage of key changes, it&#8217;s more than welcome. I&#8217;ve no doubt Arnold (call him by his name) will belt it out of the arena, in one of the most understated productions of the night, but will that be enough for us to see the contest coming the UK next year? No, no it won&#8217;t.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVXhElLlWb8">Hungary</a></strong>&#8216;s song <em>Sound of Our Hearts</em> is one of my favourites and I was most pleased to see it get through to the final. While Tuesday&#8217;s live performance didn&#8217;t quite bring the power of the recorded version, this is still a nice catchy number from the oh-so-wittily named Compact Disco.</li>
<li>Rona Nishliu from <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9zIP4FA-1Y">Albania</a></strong> has quite the pair of lungs on her. That epic shrieking was very much present in the semi-final and clearly impressed the voters. If you have ear defenders, I&#8217;d put them on before she gets going..</li>
<li>Speaking of health and safety, I hope there&#8217;s been a proper risk assessment of wearing a blindfold on stage. <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28Zel35BCwo">Lithuania</a></strong> &#8211; Donny Montell is a tricksy little man. &#8220;Look at my power ballad&#8221; he says, tempting you in, and then BOOM he&#8217;s swiping you with his up tempo song about the blindness of love. This was one of the two I voted for in the second semi-final Watch out for some seriously sub-Fizz attire removal.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_fyisw2--M">Bosnia and Herzegovina</a></strong> rightly made it through the final but there&#8217;s not much memorable about this perfectly creditable piano number to suggest it will win through. MayaSar is one of several female acts competing in the parallel game of Who&#8217;s Got <a href="https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=isch&#038;hl=en&#038;source=hp&#038;biw=1366&#038;bih=667&#038;q=servalan&#038;gbv=2&#038;oq=servalan&#038;aq=f&#038;aqi=g2g-sS1g-S1g-sS3g-S2g-sS1&#038;aql=&#038;gs_l=img.3..0l2j0i10i24j0i24j0i10i24l3j0i24l2j0i10i24.81.651.0.999.8.6.0.0.0.0.188.510.4j2.6.0...0.0.9n42sT5gfFY">Servalan</a>&#8216;s Best Outfit?</li>
<li>It&#8217;s no surprise that <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKNRGc71hjc">Russia</a></strong> made it to the final with their heady mix of crap singing and crap dancing. At least the grannies appear to be having fun, but bear in mind that they want to lure you to their gingerbread house and then bake you in their oven. You don&#8217;t want that, do you? No, of course you don&#8217;t. (On a side note: when I suggested on Twitter on Tuesday that homophobic Russia may not be an ideal host country for the next Eurovision, someone replied that they didn&#8217;t think Russia <em>was</em> homophobic. <a href="http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/03/12/russia-block-st-petersburg-s-homophobic-law">This from Human Rights Watch</a> is just one quickly Googled reason to disagree with them.)</li>
<li>I&#8217;m not ashamed to admit that I love <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8RS0eulXDo">Iceland</a></strong>&#8216;s atmospheric duet, with its dramatic lyrics and vibrant fiddling. Sadly, the foreboding silence in the middle of the song that&#8217;s in the video didn&#8217;t make it to the (tough) live realisation, but it <em>is</em> another song to feature one of tonight&#8217;s rare key changes, so cherish it.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pedf_OQmcmI">Cyprus</a></strong>&#8216;s own Catherine Zeta Jones has gone up in my estimation thanks to her performance on what looked like a dry stone wall in the first semi-final and I was pleased to see this get through. It&#8217;s pretty standard Eurodance but catchy and fun and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it does well.</li>
<li>Whistle and I&#8217;ll come to you, my <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnSmB7uBo-Y">France</a></strong>. The song is strong, original and interesting. The performance is very much targeted at the gays. The danger for Anggun is that eyes are on the topless gymnasts when ears should be on her singing. Well, that&#8217;s one danger. The other is that she gets concussion. You&#8217;ll see why.</li>
<li>France is immediately followed by another of the Big Five nations, the recently returned <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K8PB8eIy50">Italy</a></strong>. Nina Zilli has picked a style that will stand out from the crowd, although I&#8217;m still finding the transition from verse to chorus jarring. I hope this does well, as it&#8217;s been tipped, not least because I&#8217;ve drawn it to win in the office Eurovision sweepstake.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSQdnvzV8CE">Estonia</a></strong> was the other country I voted for in the second semi. It&#8217;s a nice little ballad, with no snazzy production of gimmicks, carried by a strong performance from Ott Lepland. That said, I&#8217;d be surprised if it finishes very high and you may be happy never to hear the word &#8220;Kuula&#8221; again by the end.</li>
<li>I can picture the discussion at <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOdRFtwTzb8">Norway</a></strong> Eurovision Towers (every country has a Eurovision Towers): &#8220;That guy from Sweden was good last year.&#8221; &#8220;Eric Saade.&#8221; &#8220;Yeah. Do you think he&#8217;d enter for us this year?&#8221; &#8220;I doubt it.&#8221; &#8220;Oh, why not?&#8221; &#8220;Well, for one thing he&#8217;s Swedish.&#8221; &#8220;OK, then. Launch a national Eric Saade lookalike contest, give the winner Eric Saade&#8217;s clothes and make the him represent us at Eurovision singing a not-quite-as-good-as-2011&#8242;s-<em>Popular</em> pop number. Do you think you can do that?&#8221; &#8220;Actually, I think I know just the man&#8230;&#8221; This track sounds like something Madonna rejected a decade ago. It&#8217;s fine, although I&#8217;m still not a fan of the rasping synths and I&#8217;d happily exchange it for a <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cveYAhZHEX0">Popular</a></em> or a <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtK7lsAdBos">Manboy</a></em>.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8ejpLyXSuY">Azerbaijan</a></strong> were last year&#8217;s winners and so automatically qualify for this year&#8217;s final. I&#8217;m not sure <em>When the Music Dies</em> would be hear otherwise. Look out for the old man sitting on the glass coffee table. I kid you not.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VH2t9LpRGQk">Romania</a></strong> present three minutes of unremarkable jollity. The bagpipe player appears to be a scientist from <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_Games">The War Games</a></em>.</li>
<li>I was surprised <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nR9nsKTx4g">Denmark</a></strong>&#8216;s tiresome entry made it to the final. This is just a middle of the road as it was on Tuesday, except this time I&#8217;ve already sat through it once. It&#8217;s called <em>Should&#8217;ve Known Better</em> and yes, Tuesday&#8217;s voters, you should&#8217;ve. On the plus side, one of her backing singers has a lovely armchair.</li>
<li>Good news if Denmark left you slumping in your own armchair &#8211; it&#8217;s <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isPtzi5cxBg">Greece</a></strong>! This is Eurovision by the book and is all the better for it. Catchy, upbeat and fun. I wonder if any wags on Twitter will manage to come up with a joke about the Greek debt crisis when this is on? Maybe a suggestion that Greece couldn&#8217;t afford to host the contest next year? I doubt anyone&#8217;s thought of that yet so it&#8217;ll be <em>pretty</em> funny.</li>
<li>Won&#8217;t somebody rid me of this euphoric <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nJcmLMb5to">Swede</a></strong>? The Eurovision fans have apparently been in quite the priapic state about this for months and I genuinely don&#8217;t know why. Is it because she has frizzy hair? Is it because this is the most generic &#8220;euphoria&#8221; track ever recorded and also called <em>Euphoric</em>? Bring back Eric Saade (see above). I shan&#8217;t eat my words if this wins, because I&#8217;ll still be baffled, but I don&#8217;t believe it will win so ner. Britain, DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS.</li>
<li>I expect the next song to produce a fairly poor result for <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PneOwzMz4M">Turkey</a></strong>, although it will pick up some votes from fans of capes and stereotypically gay leather caps. It fills three minutes but the only thing memorable about it is a particularly create piece of nautical choreography.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL-s0eRRYTE">Spain</a></strong> is another Big Five country with a bye to the final. It&#8217;s pretty good, although it might stand a better chance if Spain would accept the hegemony of the English language rather than stubbornly entering song after song in whatever their national language is. Extra points will be available for potentially the best key change of the night.</li>
<li>Our final Big Five entry is from <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxA6TWLttZo">Germany</a></strong>, whose track is the one that would sound most at home in the British charts. This isn&#8217;t surprising when you learn that Jamie Cullum is now working against the UK, having written this ditty for singer Roman Lob. It&#8217;s one of the last ballads in the contest, which may stand it in good stead, and Not Being Very Eurovision did no harm at all to 2010&#8242;s German winner Lena.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjhBsCop3Ys">Malta</a></strong> &#8211; <em>This is the Night</em> reminds me of Sakis Rouvas&#8217;s Greek entry <em>This is Our Night</em> from 2009, which isn&#8217;t a big problem. Malta have a habit of entering tedious ballads so this marks a pleasant change of tack, although you may, like me, feel like slapping everyone on the stage and shouting into their stupid faces that there is no Hoxton in Malta.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98FZchoQxvc">FYR Macedonia</a></strong> &#8211; This faux ballad kicks into gear just in time, turning into a nicely rocky number with some electric guitar and strings to drive it home. With all of the big guitar bands knocked out, this may fill a niche.</li>
<li>1980s training montage! It&#8217;s <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_ViQfViDPo">Ireland</a></strong> and yes, it&#8217;s Jedward. For some reason, despite them representing a country that is not the UK (their own choice), the BBC presenters keep encouraging us to get behind Jedward. I might get behind them if they were standing on some kind of high ledge, but otherwise, no thanks. This song could do well if they manage a reasonable live performance &#8211; and they have quite the outfits and staging, not to mention the backing singers, to distract from their singing.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75weifR47m0">Serbia</a></strong>&#8216;s misfortune at being early in their semi-final is offset but healthy late position in the final. This is another ballad that takes a while to get going &#8211; many of its brethren having been cast aside in the qualifying round &#8211; but it could do all right if the voters are in the mood. I doubt I shall care much by this point.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-LyyCxlSFc">Ukraine</a></strong> &#8211; This one&#8217;s not for me. It&#8217;s upbeat enough but I don&#8217;t like the syncopated synths and fake strings. It&#8217;s also mostly the same three words over and over again.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s the last song! And thankfully <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H7AILnPoio">Moldova</a></strong> have a good one. It&#8217;s cheerful, fun, has a nice ska jazz thing, a good instrumental bit and is all about how he&#8217;s going to a woo a lady with his trumpet. Also, the singer looks like he could do a bit of DIY if you needed it. The only points off are for a teasing almost-but-not-a-key-change moment (plus <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Moldova">Moldova&#8217;s another country with issues.</a>)</li>
</ol>
<p>To assist in any scoring you wish to do, I have prepared <a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/wp-content/Eurovision-2012-scoresheet1.pdf'>a Eurovision 2012 scoresheet</a>. You may find this useful if you wish to shun such nonsense categories as &#8220;Costume&#8221; or &#8220;Choreography&#8221; and focus on what the content is really about.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s that. See you at 8pm on BBC One. In the immortal words of Delia Smith: &#8220;Let&#8217;s be &#8216;avin&#8217; you! Come on!&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> So congratulations to Sweden for winning. I&#8217;m still bemused but it&#8217;s a nice, progressive country and one that takes its Eurovisioning seriously. I&#8217;d happily spend a bit of May there next year given half a chance. At least it wasn&#8217;t the Russian grannies. And very bad luck to Arnold, who came undeservedly second from last but did a great job on the night.</p>
 <div class='series_toc'><p><strong>All posts in this series:</strong></p><ul><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/01/eurovision-2012-semi-final-1/' title='Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 1'>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 1</a></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/08/eurovision-2012-semi-final-2/' title='Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 2'>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 2</a></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/15/eurovision-2012-final-prequalifiers/' title='Eurovision 2012: Final prequalifiers'>Eurovision 2012: Final prequalifiers</a></li><li><strong>Eurovision 2012: The final</strong></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/26/eurovision-2012-the-final/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eurovision 2012: Final prequalifiers</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/15/eurovision-2012-final-prequalifiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/15/eurovision-2012-final-prequalifiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eurovision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurovision Song Contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six lucky (or, in five cases, rich) countries get to jump straight to the Eurovision final. The winner of the 2011 contest and therefore host country for this year, Azerbaijan, automatically qualifies, as do the Big Five nations who significantly bankroll Eurovision. Money talks and, in this case, sings. Fortunately for the UK, we&#8217;re one [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six lucky (or, in five cases, rich) countries get to jump straight to the Eurovision final. The winner of the 2011 contest and therefore host country for this year, Azerbaijan, automatically qualifies, as do the Big Five nations who significantly bankroll Eurovision. Money talks and, in this case, sings. Fortunately for the UK, we&#8217;re one of them.</p>
<p>So how do the six songs that have taken these coveted places stand up? Let&#8217;s take a look, as we go throoooooough the keyhole.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFNv9pjqZkk">United Kingdom</a></strong> &#8211; Appealing guitar and smooth strings underscores the human anagram&#8217;s waltzing ballad. Engelbert Humperdinck is an old pro who&#8217;ll give a strong performance on the night of what is definitely one of the contest&#8217;s more memorable slow numbers. I&#8217;m not sure the key change or the overblown finale suit the song but this is a perfectly respectable contribution to the UK&#8217;s Eurovision canon.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnSmB7uBo-Y">France</a></strong>&#8216;s best entry since Sébastien Tellier failed to get the recognition he deserved back in 2008. Catchy, original and with a lovely line in whistling. Not that should affect the performance of the song, of course, but I can see the video going down very well with *cough* the average Eurovision fan.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K8PB8eIy50">Italy</a></strong> &#8211; I&#8217;ll happily take a bit of sax but this Amy Winehouse resurrection feels less than the sum of its parts. Nevertheless, it stands out from the crowd and has a certain funkiness to it. I do wish they&#8217;d choose a language and stick to it though&#8230;</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8ejpLyXSuY">Azerbaijan</a></strong>&#8216;s entry is, I&#8217;d suggest, actually better than last year&#8217;s winner &#8211; but then I had barely noticed last year&#8217;s winner and was somewhat taken aback when it did so well. This is another one for the fairly large pile marked Serviceable Ballads.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL-s0eRRYTE">Spain</a></strong> &#8211; It has a strong tune at its heart but it&#8217;s nothing special and there&#8217;s rather too much screeching towards the end for my liking.</li>
<li>A very strong song from <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxA6TWLttZo">Germany</a></strong>, who have chosen a modern power ballad that could do very well. (Singer Roman Lob did once try to represent the contry in Eurovision before, but sadly <em>When the Boys Come</em> didn&#8217;t make it to the national final.)</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s two high quality semi-finals and a good group of songs already in the final. From these six, my vote would probably go to France or Germany &#8211; given, of course, that I can&#8217;t vote for the UK <img src='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Once the semi-finals are over, we&#8217;ll know the 20 songs these six are up against along with the final running order. The first semi-final is next Tuesday, May 22nd, and will be broadcast live on BBC Three. Bring it on.</p>
 <div class='series_toc'><p><strong>All posts in this series:</strong></p><ul><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/01/eurovision-2012-semi-final-1/' title='Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 1'>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 1</a></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/08/eurovision-2012-semi-final-2/' title='Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 2'>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 2</a></li><li><strong>Eurovision 2012: Final prequalifiers</strong></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/26/eurovision-2012-the-final/' title='Eurovision 2012: The final'>Eurovision 2012: The final</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/15/eurovision-2012-final-prequalifiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 2</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/08/eurovision-2012-semi-final-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/08/eurovision-2012-semi-final-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eurovision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurovision Song Contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first Eurovision 2012 semi-final didn&#8217;t look too bad for quality, and neither, I&#8217;m pleased to report, does the second. There are none of the stonkingly weird tracks that can make Eurovision particularly entertaining, but there are plenty of good songs that deserve to get through the final on May 26th. Once again, I&#8217;ve linked [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/01/eurovision-2012-semi-final-1/">first Eurovision 2012 semi-final</a> didn&#8217;t look too bad for quality, and neither, I&#8217;m pleased to report, does the second. There are none of the stonkingly weird tracks that can make Eurovision particularly entertaining, but there are plenty of good songs that deserve to get through the final on May 26th.</p>
<p>Once again, I&#8217;ve linked each country name to the song&#8217;s video on YouTube so that you can see for yourself what I&#8217;m blathering about, should you wish.</p>
<p>This is the semi-final we in the UK are able to vote in, so play close attention. Here are the good, the bad, the ugly and the rest from Semi-Final 2:</p>
<h3>The Good</h3>
<p>In alphabetical order, these are the ten songs I&#8217;d put through to the final:
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnJZG0eyavs">Belarus</a></strong> &#8211; Rock breaks into the second semi-final with fresh-faced emo motorcycle gang Litesound. (The title, <em>We Are the Heroes</em>, made me briefly confuse this with 2006&#8242;s Lithuanian horror, <em>We Are the Winners</em>.) I prefer this to Switzerland&#8217;s lone rock effort from the previous semi.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_fyisw2--M">Bosnia and Herzegovina</a></strong> &#8211; A pleasant enough piano ballad that builds gently. It&#8217;s position penultimate in the running order may mean it sticks the memory.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5_tqyCjFZ8">Croatia</a></strong> &#8211; This is  good but, like so many other songs this year, takes a little too long to come alive. When it does, though, it&#8217;s enough to elevate <em>Nebo</em> for promotion. The video offers a group of half naked men fighting over a double bass and the Croatian Andrea Corr, in case that boats your float.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSQdnvzV8CE">Estonia</a></strong> &#8211; I haven&#8217;t checked the translation but from my rough Estonian I think this is a song about a man&#8217;s love for his pet koala. It&#8217;s one of the stronger ballads and some female backing vocals to complement Ott Lepland&#8217;s lead plus a sneaky key change push this through for me.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28Zel35BCwo">Lithuania</a></strong> &#8211; Part power ballad, part up tempo number, this has the final spot in the semi-final and I can see it happily &#8211; and deservedly &#8211; winging its way through to a place in the final.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98FZchoQxvc">FYR Macedonia</a></strong> &#8211; There is definitely a theme emerging: gentle tracks with some nice musicality that switch up a gear part way through (much to my relief). This is very much in that category: I was sceptical at the beginning, encouraged only by a touch of violin, but then jumped up a level,  passed Go and collected 200 Macedonian denars.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjhBsCop3Ys">Malta</a></strong> &#8211; Nice of Malta to enter an upbeat number rather than a dreary ballad, so points for that. <em>This is the Night</em> is like one of the better reality show singles: it&#8217;s catchy and entertaining but strangely empty and if you peeled away the layers, deep in its heart you&#8217;d find Simon Cowell rubbing himself all over with £50 notes. Warning: if you watch the video, you may break your computer monitor as the desire to punch most of the people in it becomes overwhelming.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOdRFtwTzb8">Norway</a></strong> &#8211; One can&#8217;t help but notice the similarities between this and 2011&#8242;s third placed <em>Popular</em> by Eric Saade from Sweden. This is nowhere near as good but it succeeds in &#8211; ahem &#8211; playing to the same market. It&#8217;s hard to dislike &#8211; more rasping synths aside &#8211; but it may find itself in competition with Lithuania.</li>
<li>I went to <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75weifR47m0">Serbia</a></strong> for the first time in March and had a brief discussion there about Eurovision. The Serbians I spoke to enjoy the contest but were concerned that the break-up of Yugoslavia and the USSR into multiple entrants (just look how many I&#8217;ve already included) makes it much harder for a Western European country to win &#8211; a view I&#8217;m sure is shared on this side of the continent. Their entry this year doesn&#8217;t start too promisingly, with a strong intrumental offset by some tedious balladeering of the kind I can live without. Nevertheless, I can see this doing all right (if it&#8217;s not impacted by going first) and once it springs to life, it&#8217;s not bad at all. (Željko Joksimović came close to winning back in 2004 with <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqgh0DdjDls">Lane Moje</a></em>.)</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2_7YdLk1Tc">Slovakia</a></strong> &#8211; The loud metal opening made me expect awfulness from this but it&#8217;s another OK rock track. This will be going up again Belarus for those votes and I can see the extra drama of this song helping Slovakia to win that match-up.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Bad</h3>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid I can only muster one bad song for this section, and I&#8217;ll confess here it&#8217;s not even properly terrible. The culprit is&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUrkusKotaA">Slovenia</a></strong> &#8211; They&#8217;ve found their  way into this section because they commit the ultimate Eurovision sin: it doesn&#8217;t matter how tuneful or well performed your song is if it&#8217;s dull, dull, dull. You can use all key changes and comedy headwear you like &#8211; and the last 30 seconds almost redeem it &#8211; but it&#8217;s stil nul points from me.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Ugly</h3>
<p>Again, only one song managed to shoehorn its way into this category:
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1kCgD626Go">Georgia</a></strong>&#8216;s entry deserves to be much worse than it is. It&#8217;s several songs mixed into one with some curious decisions, not least in the production of the creepy video. It&#8217;s kind of fun despite that, but I&#8217;m not ruling out having nightmares about a scary man in a white suit.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Rest</h3>
<p>The rules of maths mean that we&#8217;re left with six songs that won&#8217;t do anyone any harm but don&#8217;t make my top tier:
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VurCPgXrkdg">Bulgaria</a></strong> &#8211; The weakest of the Eurodance numbers, with deductions for being this year&#8217;s most cynical attempt to use lots of different languages in one song. It&#8217;s not awful but definitely a good moment to go and make that cup of tea.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfofDgg-Jww">Netherlands</a></strong> &#8211; Oh, Beth Orton, where did it all go wrong? It&#8217;s hard to pick out anything that&#8217;s definitively wrong with this: it&#8217;s tuneful enough, it has a clear style of its own, and yet&#8230; I think perhaps it&#8217;s so inoffensive that it&#8217;s gone right round past infinity and come back as offensive, its twee lyrics giving even Brotherhood of Man a run for their money. I can&#8217;t say it&#8217;s bad but I&#8217;d happily never have to hear it again. (And yes, I restrained myself from commenting on singer/writer Joan&#8217;s <em>interesting</em> choice of outfit.)</li>
<li>Come on, <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPJUJHLGhA8">Portugal</a></strong> &#8211; let&#8217;s not do this. There were a few nice touches, but when the backing singers came on I was hoping it was a sign of impending excitement rather than a few oohs, aahs and uninteresting harmonies. Go away and do it again.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nJcmLMb5to">Sweden</a></strong> &#8211; More tedious syncopated synth Eurodance. At least its title will help those compiling this years&#8217; euphoria albums work out whether it qualifies for inclusion. I wouldn&#8217;t be at all surprised if it does OK &#8211; it&#8217;s unfathomably been tipped for huge success &#8211; but *mumbles something about ABBA*</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PneOwzMz4M">Turkey</a></strong> have had a mixed track record over the last decade with several songs hitting the top five, including 2003&#8242;s winner <em>Everyway That I Can</em> and 2009&#8242;s unforgettable <em>D&uuml;m Tek Tek</em>. I can&#8217;t see <em>Love Me Back</em> setting the EBU on fire with its bizarre lyrics and obsession with nautical metaphors but neither is it a shipwreck.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-LyyCxlSFc">Ukraine</a></strong> &#8211; After a promising intro, I turned against this. With its mainstream dance attitude, it could do well given the right audience, but those syncopated synths and artificial strings don&#8217;t appeal to me at all.</li>
</ul>
<p>Another good line-up so tune in for the second semi-final on Thursday 24th and see who makes it though &#8211; and cast your vote. I&#8217;m leaning towards Lithuania, Slovakia or Belarus but we&#8217;ll see how they do on the night.</p>
<p>Next time: the Big Five bankrolling countries and last year&#8217;s winner Azerbaijan are guaranteed places in the final. We&#8217;ll take a look at the six songs the winners of the semi-finals will be facing on May 26th.</p>
 <div class='series_toc'><p><strong>All posts in this series:</strong></p><ul><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/01/eurovision-2012-semi-final-1/' title='Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 1'>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 1</a></li><li><strong>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 2</strong></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/15/eurovision-2012-final-prequalifiers/' title='Eurovision 2012: Final prequalifiers'>Eurovision 2012: Final prequalifiers</a></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/26/eurovision-2012-the-final/' title='Eurovision 2012: The final'>Eurovision 2012: The final</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/08/eurovision-2012-semi-final-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 1</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/01/eurovision-2012-semi-final-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/01/eurovision-2012-semi-final-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 10:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eurovision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurovision Song Contest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=2164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello. Yes, it&#8217;s been a while, hasn&#8217;t it? But the arrival of May heralds the Coming of the Contest and Twitter just isn&#8217;t up to the task of telling all I have to tell about this year&#8217;s Eurovision. My pre-show pontificating is divided into three posts: one for each semi-final (of which, you will correctly [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. Yes, it&#8217;s been a while, hasn&#8217;t it? But the arrival of May heralds the Coming of the Contest and Twitter just isn&#8217;t up to the task of telling all I have to tell about this year&#8217;s Eurovision.</p>
<p>My pre-show pontificating is divided into three posts: one for each semi-final (of which, you will correctly surmise, there are two) and one for the final. On your behalf, I&#8217;ve endured all of this year&#8217;s songs and compiled some brief thoughts. I&#8217;ve linked the country name to the song&#8217;s video on the official <a href="http://youtube.com/eurovision">Eurovision YouTube channel</a> to make it as easy as possible for you to agree with me (or disagree, if you&#8217;re crazy).</p>
<p>As has been the case for a few years now, the large number of participating countries means we&#8217;re treated to semi-finals in order to whittle the songs down to a barely manageable final. Fear not: the UK&#8217;s financial contribution to the competition means we never have to go through the indignity of being knocked out in the first round. We&#8217;ll be voting for the songs in second semi-final, so we&#8217;ll only get to cast formal judgement on these if they make it through to the big event, which is being held in Azerbaijan on Saturday 26th May. In some cases, I really hope we&#8217;re spared.</p>
<p>So, without further ado, let&#8217;s take a look at the countries who&#8217;ve been drawn in the first semi-final.</p>
<h3>The Good</h3>
<p>The ones I liked and hope to see get through to the next stage, in alphabetical order:
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isPtzi5cxBg">Greece</a></strong> have a strong track record of memorable, up tempo Eurovision entries and this is very much in that vein. It&#8217;s almost Eurovision by numbers &#8211; pick a one word title (in this case the suitably exotic sounding <em>Aphrodisiac</em>) and contrive a song around it &#8211; with the musical production updated for 2012. I&#8217;m not complaining: this is surely one for the final and it&#8217;s the only one of the entrants to lodge itself unbidden inside my head.</li>
<li>Next up is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Idiot's_Lantern">Maureen Lipman</a>&#8216;s favourite Eurovision country: <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVXhElLlWb8">Hungary</a></strong>. This one keeps <em>just</em> on the right side of &uuml;ber earnest and I really like the musical production (though how that will translate on the night is anyone&#8217;s guess). The last Hungary song I liked was <em>Dance With Me</em> <a href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2009/05/08/eurovision-2009/">in 2009</a> and that sank without a trace, so I&#8217;m hoping for better luck this time.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8RS0eulXDo">Iceland</a></strong> will hope to put European prejudices against ash clouds and defaulting banks behind them, and with <em>Never Forget</em> they may. I rather like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8RS0eulXDo">the video, with its Icelandic scenescape</a>, but more importantly I like the song. I&#8217;m a sucker for atmospheric strings, syncopated percussion and a male-female counterpoint &#8211; even if there is a touch of Evanescence to it. Since they then add a sudden silence (which I hope survives in the live version) and a key change, I&#8217;d put this straight through to the final. (You may remember J&oacute;nsi&#8217;s cheekbones from such Eurovisions as 2004, where he performed 19th-placed power ballad <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3U-37Gd2rU">Heaven</a></em>.)</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_ViQfViDPo">Ireland</a></strong> &#8211; I&#8217;d never heard Jedward sing before last year&#8217;s contest, having not seen whichever talent show from which they emerged, and this year they&#8217;re back for a second helping of Eurovision. <em>Waterline</em> feels like it&#8217;s fallen off a Stock, Aitken and Waterman landfill of leftover pop songs, but that&#8217;s by no means a bad thing. It could do well &#8211; although I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the twins&#8217; live performance falls short of the recorded version, which could impact on their chances. Either way, it needs to accompany a training montage in a 1980s action film as soon as possible.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H7AILnPoio">Moldova</a></strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s cheesy as sin &#8211; worse, it&#8217;s cheesy as actual cheese &#8211; but it&#8217;s one of many songs in this first semi-final with a winning cheerfulness that keeps the whole thing bouncing along quite happily. A nice instrumental in the middle and a ska jazz feel make it a keeper.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VH2t9LpRGQk">Romania</a></strong> &#8211; Bagpipes, drums and accordion are all part of <em>Zaleilah</em>&#8216;s charm. I suspect the lyrics mean nothing of note but this is a bit of light fun and begs to be served with rum.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Bad</h3>
<p>There&#8217;s a disappointing dearth of truly terrible entries this year &#8211; I don&#8217;t know what the other countries think they&#8217;re playing at &#8211; but there are certainly some songs I&#8217;d like to see taken down the knacker&#8217;s yard and put out of our misery. For example&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKQf8Z5uWQ8">Austria</a></strong> &#8211; Yes, they are genuinely using the band name Trackshittaz. To their credit, it&#8217;s an appropriate name, because, to their deficit and excuse mon français, the track is utterly shit. Awful, shouty rubbish. Still, sung in German, &#8220;Woki mit deim Popo&#8221; sounds rude, so at least that&#8217;s entertaining.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nR9nsKTx4g">Denmark</a></strong> &#8211; I&#8217;ve often loved overlooked Danish entries (and pastries, for that matter), and now that we all love <em>The Killing</em> and <em>Borgen</em>, could it be Denmark&#8217;s year? No, no it won&#8217;t. Soluna Samay is so middle of the road, her only chance of creating excitement is if she trips over the cat&#8217;s eyes. Tiresome.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CzSRTGq6Ds">Latvia</a></strong> &#8211; Oh cripes: it&#8217;s a Eurovision song about recording a song for Eurovision, and its winning no fans here with the lyric &#8220;I was born in distant 1980&#8243;. A Eurovision fan friend asked me a few weeks ago whether singer Anmary was in on the joke. I really hope so. Yes, it&#8217;s catchy, but so&#8217;s smallpox. If the lyrics were in foreign, this might be passable &#8211; as it is, it&#8217;s hideous and deserves to be burned. Right now.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKNRGc71hjc">Russia</a></strong> &#8211; The Eurovision gays won&#8217;t be in any hurry for Russia to host the contest again so this dreadful chorus line of singing grannies could be perfect news, if only we didn&#8217;t have to listen to it. That said, it does run the major risk of picking up a shedload of &#8220;ironic&#8221; votes from across the continent. The dancing is only marginally more co-ordinated than Pan&#8217;s People, the singing is less tuneful than Jemini and the song itself is dire, so anything could happen.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqwBh9hq9PE">San Marino</a></strong> &#8211; &#8220;Do you wanna be more than just a friend? Do you wanna play cybersex again? If you wanna come to my house then click me with your mouse.&#8221; Those lyrics alone tell you all you need to know about the horror that is <em>The Social Network Song</em>. Someone&#8217;s noticed that the internet&#8217;s a thing and decided to write a sub-Whigfield pun-laden Eurovision entry about it &#8211; and then autotuned it to death. And the social networks have spoken: its YouTube Dislikes are outnumbering its Likes by more than three to one. &#8220;Oh oh &#8211; uh &#8211; oh oh&#8221; indeed.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Ugly</h3>
<p>Some songs defy categorisation, and they&#8217;re the ones I&#8217;ve included in this category:
<ul>
<li>Sometimes <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWMH6ID6Enc">Israel</a></strong> give us a stonking pop song; sometimes it&#8217;s a terribly worthy ballad about how good it would be if everyone just got along; and sometimes it&#8217;s just bizarre. This time it&#8217;s a kitch number that sounds like it&#8217;s fallen through time from one of those 1970s <em>Top of the Pops</em> they show on BBC Four to save them making new programmes. It&#8217;s too jolly to actively dislike but Slade were never my scene and I don&#8217;t like <em>Star Wars</em>. (I do like <em>Star Wars</em>.)</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6S-FNLv2jQ">Montenegro</a></strong> will open the show with <em>Euro Neuro</em> and we start as we might hope to go on: bonkers. It&#8217;s a strange fusion of folk instruments, funky beat and monotonous rapping, like an Eastern European <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cake_(band)">Cake</a>, and there is clear evidence the lyricist got drunk and made a series of ill-advised bets with a rhyming dictionary. For all that, the chorus is memorable (for the duration of the song).</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Rest</h3>
<p>The remaining songs were neither particularly good, nor particularly bad. The word &#8220;meh&#8221; is frowned upon, so we&#8217;ll just call them &#8220;the rest&#8221;:
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9zIP4FA-1Y">Albania</a></strong> &#8211; I spent two of this song&#8217;s three minutes waiting for it to start. It eventually did (complete with some epic shrieking), but that&#8217;s not making the best use of the allocated stage time. The video&#8217;s worth a look: a woman with her legs in a box; two children drawing chalk lines on a wall; a weird bird mask; a tealight on a record player. I&#8217;m not saying Rona Nishliu doesn&#8217;t have good hair &#8211; I&#8217;ve got nothing against the hair &#8211; but I <em>am</em> saying this song could be better. On the other hand, it also could be worse.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pGWkV7y6As">Belgium</a></strong> &#8211; When the drums came in a third of the way through, I was hoping this was going to turn into a big number. Instead, it just carried on as before but with drums. Sorry, Iris: this may still be better than most of whatever the kidz listen to today, but you&#8217;re no Sergio &#038; The Ladies.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pedf_OQmcmI">Cyprus</a></strong> &#8211; Here comes the Eurodance. That&#8217;s pretty much all you need to know, and being the only track from that oeuvre in the semi, it should corner the market. It&#8217;s not bad, although nothing special for the genre &#8211; it would play quite happily in a club in Ibiza or Gran Canaria or Frinton or wherever it is one goes to take E and dance topless these days. As the title <em>La La Love</em> suggests, there are a lot of la la la la las &#8211; and then it abruptly stops because its three minutes are up. NB: the video appears to feature Catherine Zeta Jones being chased by Tracy Scoggins in a funny hat.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43GWoVxRk2Y">Finland</a></strong> &#8211; Interestingly, this is sung in Swedish. (Look, it&#8217;s interesting to me. So Suomi.) I don&#8217;t understand a word but I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s very poetic. The song has a pleasant, gentle melody and Anna Friel did an OK job singing it, but I can&#8217;t see it sparking a riot at Our Price or overloading the phone voting lines.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yX1dIK9vuc">Switzerland</a></strong> &#8211; Sinplus, the first rock band in this year&#8217;s contest, offer a less than subtle &#8220;follow your dreams&#8221; message. <em>Unbreakable</em> isn&#8217;t breaking any new ground &#8211; who is it I&#8217;m reminded of? Snow Patrol? The Pigeon Detectives? &#8211; but it fills three minutes without complaint and as the only guitar band in this semi-final, they stand a good chance of getting through. Of course, when it comes to the voting, I expect Switzerland to give everybody two points.</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s not a bad line-up, I&#8217;d say, so expect a watchable semi-final on Tuesday 22nd May. Were we phone voting for this programme, I&#8217;d be calling up to vote for Iceland and Hungary.</p>
<p>Next time: eighteen more countries battle it out for ten coveted final places in Semi-Final 2. Stay tuned!</p>
 <div class='series_toc'><p><strong>All posts in this series:</strong></p><ul><li><strong>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 1</strong></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/08/eurovision-2012-semi-final-2/' title='Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 2'>Eurovision 2012: Semi-Final 2</a></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/15/eurovision-2012-final-prequalifiers/' title='Eurovision 2012: Final prequalifiers'>Eurovision 2012: Final prequalifiers</a></li><li><a href='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/26/eurovision-2012-the-final/' title='Eurovision 2012: The final'>Eurovision 2012: The final</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2012/05/01/eurovision-2012-semi-final-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.401 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
