<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A matter of legitimacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2008/04/26/a-matter-of-legitimacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2008/04/26/a-matter-of-legitimacy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2008/04/26/a-matter-of-legitimacy/#comment-46517</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=1077#comment-46517</guid>
		<description>I've had a quick look. There are a few Henry Beards, none of quite the right age, and one Elizabeth Alleway not in quite the right place. I could have done with their fathers names on the marriage certificates to help me pinpoint the right families on the 1841...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a quick look. There are a few Henry Beards, none of quite the right age, and one Elizabeth Alleway not in quite the right place. I could have done with their fathers names on the marriage certificates to help me pinpoint the right families on the 1841&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2008/04/26/a-matter-of-legitimacy/#comment-46432</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 23:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/?p=1077#comment-46432</guid>
		<description>Hm, interesting. I have definitely seen cases where the father's *profession* is not recorded if he is deceased, but never the actual name being omitted. One could tell, perhaps, by looking at John Ball's original register to see whether this really was normal practice, but it's probably easier to just try and rule out the illegitimacy possibility.

Have you got around to looking at the 1841 census? I only ask cos I is on ancestry.com if you isn't... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, interesting. I have definitely seen cases where the father&#8217;s *profession* is not recorded if he is deceased, but never the actual name being omitted. One could tell, perhaps, by looking at John Ball&#8217;s original register to see whether this really was normal practice, but it&#8217;s probably easier to just try and rule out the illegitimacy possibility.</p>
<p>Have you got around to looking at the 1841 census? I only ask cos I is on ancestry.com if you isn&#8217;t&#8230; <img src='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
