<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biometric passports not secure - another blow for ID cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/11/17/biometric-passports-not-secure-another-blow-for-id-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/11/17/biometric-passports-not-secure-another-blow-for-id-cards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SBR8: Why you should pay attention to bloggers (again) &#171; Scottish Blogging Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/11/17/biometric-passports-not-secure-another-blow-for-id-cards/#comment-22334</link>
		<dc:creator>SBR8: Why you should pay attention to bloggers (again) &#171; Scottish Blogging Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/11/17/biometric-passports-not-secure-another-blow-for-id-cards/#comment-22334</guid>
		<description>[...] Away from the celebration of blogs though. It turns out that biometric passports can be hacked. Who didn&#8217;t see that one coming?! Will Howells compares Nick Clegg&#8217;s response to the news to that of the Home Office. Meanwhile, Garry Smith has a cheeky suggestion about what we should use biometric identifiers on the National Identity Register for. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Away from the celebration of blogs though. It turns out that biometric passports can be hacked. Who didn&#8217;t see that one coming?! Will Howells compares Nick Clegg&#8217;s response to the news to that of the Home Office. Meanwhile, Garry Smith has a cheeky suggestion about what we should use biometric identifiers on the National Identity Register for. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BenJ</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/11/17/biometric-passports-not-secure-another-blow-for-id-cards/#comment-22309</link>
		<dc:creator>BenJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/11/17/biometric-passports-not-secure-another-blow-for-id-cards/#comment-22309</guid>
		<description>What I liked most about this story was John Humphrys' introdcution for the No2ID spokesman on this morning's Today programme, in which he mis-read the organization's name as "Number Two ID" (only to be swiftly corrected by said spokesman).

"Ah, that makes more sense," he said.

Actually I was quite liking the image that Humphrys' version projected of the UK government's biometric ID plans as a big steaming pile of Number Two... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I liked most about this story was John Humphrys&#8217; introdcution for the No2ID spokesman on this morning&#8217;s Today programme, in which he mis-read the organization&#8217;s name as &#8220;Number Two ID&#8221; (only to be swiftly corrected by said spokesman).</p>
<p>&#8220;Ah, that makes more sense,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Actually I was quite liking the image that Humphrys&#8217; version projected of the UK government&#8217;s biometric ID plans as a big steaming pile of Number Two&#8230; <img src='http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.166 seconds -->
