<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coulter: Clinton&#8217;s a bit gay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/07/28/coulter-clintons-a-bit-gay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/07/28/coulter-clintons-a-bit-gay/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gert</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/07/28/coulter-clintons-a-bit-gay/#comment-18417</link>
		<dc:creator>Gert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/07/28/coulter-clintons-a-bit-gay/#comment-18417</guid>
		<description>Well, if what she says is true, it does rather mean that, considering the enormous numbers of promiscuous supposedly straight men over the centuries, it probably isn't a good idea to be toocritical of homosexuality. Indeed there it is a very strong argument forencouraging homosexuality because these latent homosexual promiscuous heterosexual men like Clinton are harming women by their inability to commit to women.

Obviously I think it's rubbish. Men are genetically programmed to impregnate as many women as possible; women to be sure who the father oftheir child is. so a lot more straight men would be more promiscuous but for the lack of promiscuous women (societally I mean - individuals make individual choices), whereas promiscuity is associated with male homosexuality because of the balanced genetic programming. 

If this makes sense...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if what she says is true, it does rather mean that, considering the enormous numbers of promiscuous supposedly straight men over the centuries, it probably isn&#8217;t a good idea to be toocritical of homosexuality. Indeed there it is a very strong argument forencouraging homosexuality because these latent homosexual promiscuous heterosexual men like Clinton are harming women by their inability to commit to women.</p>
<p>Obviously I think it&#8217;s rubbish. Men are genetically programmed to impregnate as many women as possible; women to be sure who the father oftheir child is. so a lot more straight men would be more promiscuous but for the lack of promiscuous women (societally I mean - individuals make individual choices), whereas promiscuity is associated with male homosexuality because of the balanced genetic programming. </p>
<p>If this makes sense&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/07/28/coulter-clintons-a-bit-gay/#comment-18410</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/07/28/coulter-clintons-a-bit-gay/#comment-18410</guid>
		<description>She probably hates JFK too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She probably hates JFK too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Whenman</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/07/28/coulter-clintons-a-bit-gay/#comment-18409</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Whenman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/07/28/coulter-clintons-a-bit-gay/#comment-18409</guid>
		<description>"&lt;em&gt;may&lt;/em&gt; contain nuts"
Why is there any element of doubt there? To link promiscuity and homosexuality is to effectively out every adulterer in history... including JFK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>may</em> contain nuts&#8221;<br />
Why is there any element of doubt there? To link promiscuity and homosexuality is to effectively out every adulterer in history&#8230; including JFK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.166 seconds -->
