<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hostel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/03/27/hostel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/03/27/hostel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:05:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Brush With Art &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Art and Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/03/27/hostel/comment-page-1/#comment-16901</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brush With Art &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Art and Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/03/27/hostel/#comment-16901</guid>
		<description>[...] because although he does not explicitly say it he is by implication saying that this film, incidentally a film which he has not himself seen, is pornographic. This is a dangerous thing as there are even bigger problems with the whole art and pornography argument than there are in the art and censorship debate, I will not go into that here as I have covered this topic already, see here. Will Howells at No Geek is an Island reviewed the same film on his blog and came to a different conclusion of the film saying that it is:- &#8220;Effectively directed, suitably eerie, and with a satisfying finale, Hostel also has its fair share of gore - although not notably more than other recent horror films. It is a touch more sadistic, but just about justifies this as a necessary part of the plot.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] because although he does not explicitly say it he is by implication saying that this film, incidentally a film which he has not himself seen, is pornographic. This is a dangerous thing as there are even bigger problems with the whole art and pornography argument than there are in the art and censorship debate, I will not go into that here as I have covered this topic already, see here. Will Howells at No Geek is an Island reviewed the same film on his blog and came to a different conclusion of the film saying that it is:- &#8220;Effectively directed, suitably eerie, and with a satisfying finale, Hostel also has its fair share of gore &#8211; although not notably more than other recent horror films. It is a touch more sadistic, but just about justifies this as a necessary part of the plot.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.453 seconds -->
