<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ming: In or out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: No geek is an island &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Voted</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>No geek is an island &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Voted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>[...] The candidates were pretty well matched when it came to questions and I suspect that, as the hustings have gone on, they&#8217;ve adopted some of each others policies and turns of phrase to fill in gaps of their own. None of them scored a knockout blow, although I was pleased to see that Huhne has started reference Ming&#8217;s U-turn over Iraq. Huhne stickers appeared to be shifting well after the event. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The candidates were pretty well matched when it came to questions and I suspect that, as the hustings have gone on, they&#8217;ve adopted some of each others policies and turns of phrase to fill in gaps of their own. None of them scored a knockout blow, although I was pleased to see that Huhne has started reference Ming&#8217;s U-turn over Iraq. Huhne stickers appeared to be shifting well after the event. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>I'll answer those questions David:

Many of our best politicians: Charles Kennedy, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins, were once members of the Labour Party.

Secondly, the old Liberal Party were comparable to Jehovah's Witnesses!  It is a testament to how the party has matured over the past 15 years that this is no longer the case.

Thirdly, Ming has too many "over excited spokesmen" saying "silly" things - it has become a daily routine. Don't you think it is incumbant on someone who expects to LEAD a political party to get his own house in order first?  This is a deadly serious question of leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll answer those questions David:</p>
<p>Many of our best politicians: Charles Kennedy, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins, were once members of the Labour Party.</p>
<p>Secondly, the old Liberal Party were comparable to Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses!  It is a testament to how the party has matured over the past 15 years that this is no longer the case.</p>
<p>Thirdly, Ming has too many &#8220;over excited spokesmen&#8221; saying &#8220;silly&#8221; things - it has become a daily routine. Don&#8217;t you think it is incumbant on someone who expects to LEAD a political party to get his own house in order first?  This is a deadly serious question of leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>Do you have any comment on Chris being a former member of the labour party? also aren't you rather over playing the ming/iraq thing. just because a over excited spokesman for a campaign says something silly. finally what do you think about Chris comparing the old Liberal party to Jehovahs Witnesses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any comment on Chris being a former member of the labour party? also aren&#8217;t you rather over playing the ming/iraq thing. just because a over excited spokesman for a campaign says something silly. finally what do you think about Chris comparing the old Liberal party to Jehovahs Witnesses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 02:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/2006/02/02/ming-in-or-out/#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>Thank you for bringing together the detail on this one - it certainly looks like a strange change of position. I was sure I remembered Ming calling for a timetable for withdrawal last year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for bringing together the detail on this one - it certainly looks like a strange change of position. I was sure I remembered Ming calling for a timetable for withdrawal last year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.189 seconds -->
